加利福尼亚州加重对溢油犯罪的刑事处罚力度

来源:美国保赔协会@2020.12.02


请会员请参阅协会2020年10月14日第39/20号通函内容:依据新法,自2021年1月1日起,在加利福尼亚州水域内由船舶造成的油污损害将被施以新的罚款处罚。

油污损害保障
请会员知悉,国际保赔集团(IG)协会已经就新法对于污染风险承保带来的潜在影响进行考量。虽然了解到当局有可能对污染者处以巨额罚款,但IG协会认为不宜仅仅因为这一个新增独立法规来对当前的赔偿限额进行修改。

根据当前全球再保险市场现状,为充分应对加州法院对事故污染可能征收的最高罚款额而提高赔偿额度是不可能实现的。然而,提醒会员注意,协会已为油污损害提供了单船单次事故10亿美元的赔偿限额,承保内容包括响应费用、第三方索赔以及协会规则范围内的罚款,这个限额仍然可以满足OPA 90项下的所有责任限额,无论是何种船型。
 
在决定污染事故罚款金额时,加州法院拥有充分的自由裁量权来考虑加重处罚和减轻处罚的情况。这些考虑因素包括:(1)责任程度,包括导致事故发生的事件;(2)及时准确的报告;(3)有效反应和清理工作;(4)及时公平地赔偿受损方;(5)对自然资源的补救工作;以及(6)泄漏方的财政支付能力。至于后者,IG得到的法律意见是,即便得到法律授权,法庭也不能施加超出被告支付能力的巨额处罚。

IG还将与联盟成员一起继续采取积极措施,探讨如何解决业内对于新法的担忧,但是很明显的是,任何措施都不会影响新法在加利福尼亚的生效日期。

国际保赔集团所有协会均发布类似通函。


Members are referred to Circular 39/20 of October 14, 2020 advising of the new fines that will be applicable in California from January 1, 2021 for ship-sourced oil pollution damage in Californian State waters. 


Oil pollution damage cover 

Members are informed that the International Group (IG) clubs have considered the potential impact on cover for pollution risks of this new legislation. While having in mind the potential for substantial fines to be issued against a polluter, the IG clubs did not believe that it would be appropriate to seek to amend the existing limit of cover to respond to this significant, but nonetheless isolated, new piece of legislation. 


Any such amendment would in any event be impossible to achieve within the current confines of the global reinsurance markets if sufficient cover were to be required to respond in full to the maximum level of fines that might potentially be levied by Californian courts for accidental pollution. Members are however reminded that there is already cover of US$1 billion per ship per incident for oil pollution damage, which covers response costs and third party claims as well as fines where they fall under Club rules, and all limits of liability under OPA `90 regardless of ship type remain capable of cover well within this capacity. 


The Californian courts have substantial discretion to consider relevant aggravating and mitigating circumstances relating to a pollution incident when determining the amount of fines. These considerations include, among others, (1) the degree of culpability including the events leading up to the incident (2) prompt and accurate reporting; (3) effective response and clean-up efforts; (4) prompt and fair compensation to damaged parties; (5) remedial efforts towards natural resources; and finally, (6) the spilling party’s financial ability to pay. As to the latter, the legal advice received by the IG is that a court cannot impose a punishment, even if authorized by statute, that is so excessive as to be beyond the defendant’s ability to pay. 


The IG is also continuing to take active steps in conjunction with coalition partners to explore the possibility of addressing industry’s concerns arising from this new law, although it remains clear that any such steps will not affect the entry into force date of the new law in California.


All Clubs in the International Group have issued similar circulars.